![]() Under general relativity, anti-gravity is impossible except under contrived circumstances. Quantum physicists have postulated the existence of gravitons, a set of massless elementary particles that transmit the force, and the possibility of creating or destroying these is still unclear. In the 20th century, Newton’s model was replaced by mainstream science to general relativity where gravity is not a force but the result of the geometry of space-time. That is, it is the non-local interaction of objects that are separated in space. In Newton’s law of universal gravitation, gravity was an external force transmitted by unknown means, “action at a distance” which is the concept that an object can be moved, changed, or otherwise affected without being physically touched (as in mechanical contact) by another object. It is also common today to see the word “anti-gravity” used in the descriptive title of many research papers and related projects involving levitation of objects using ion wind propulsion, magnetics, electrostatics and other forms of unorthodox propulsion means. Even though this can be done mathematically by using the letter “i” as an imaginary operator, it cannot exist in the real world, for it implies a negative mass or distance less than zero which cannot exist in event time frames of the real world as is understood by mainstream physics today! “Anti-gravity” is also quite often used colloquially to refer to devices that appear to reverse gravity even though they operate through other understandable means, such as lifters, which are currently believed by mainstream science to fly by moving air within electric fields. For example, based on electrical engineering and quantum mechanics the term “anti-gravity” could imply that you take the square root of a negative number. In my experience, it appears that different people invent for themselves what the term “anti-gravity” means to them and then argue about its usage. The original inspiration of my video “Antigravity” the Reality series was to show interested people “REAL” tested unorthodox experiments that can levitate objects. I have intentionally used the term “anti-gravity” to suggest true scientifically repeatable methods of levitating objects in unorthodox ways such as without propellers, jets or rocket propulsion as opposed to fake or unrepeatable experiments or presentations, mainly by “armchair” scientists or people that speculate or form opinions about how to create antigravity that dominate the word “antigravity,” and in my opinion do not form a solid basis from where to start serious research and experimentation. Science fiction has always inspired reality. An early example is the gravity blocking substance “Cavorite” in H. Therefore, when I use the word anti gravity, I place the term within quotation marks which is intended to suggest that the term can be used in unusual ways by different people, or other expressions that vary from standard usage, for “anti-gravity” is just an idealistic concept and a recurring concept in science fiction, particularly in the context of spacecraft propulsion. ![]() This would suggest an attractive force to gravity rather than a repelling force, as opposite forces such as opposite magnetic polarities and electrical charges in our real world attract rather than repel. The term “Anti-gravity” is just an idea or concept of creating a place or object that is free from the force of gravity. In the English language, the general dictionary definition of the prefix “anti” is “against,” “opposite of,” and can be used freely in combination with elements of any origin, so the actual word, “anti-gravity” would imply “Against gravity”, or the “opposite of gravity” which literally describes anything that is air born! In scientific usage, the word, “anti” may imply an “antiparticle of,” which indicates the opposite to, or negative polarity of gravity. “ANTI GRAVITY”-The Reality John R Iwaszko
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |